catena/crates/bindings/README.md

catena (bindings)

The catena libraries behind one surface, for calling in process rather than as a subprocess.

Part of catena.

What it does

Every tool in this workspace is a library with a thin command on top. A pipeline written in another language can have either.

A subprocess is the right answer most of the time: it is a real process boundary, it composes with a shell, and it costs a few milliseconds. In process is the right answer when the caller is already holding the text — a stage that would otherwise write a file so that it can read it straight back.

What comes back is the same record shapes the commands write to stdout, as dictionaries rather than lines of JSON. Those shapes are documented and versioned; the structs behind them are free to move.

Three of them: Python, JavaScript through WebAssembly, and a C ABI. All three call the same Rust and hand back the same records.

Python

pip install catena-corpus

import catena

chunks = catena.chunk_markdown(markdown, target=512, overlap=64)
chunks[0]["page"]        # 41
chunks[0]["chapter"]     # 'III. The Second Estate'

clean = catena.scrub(raw_markdown, pages=True)
catena.count_tokens(clean)

cues = catena.parse_subtitles(open("episode.srt").read())
passages = catena.pack_cues(cues, seconds=75)

catena.identify("atlas.pdf", open("atlas.pdf", "rb").read(1024))["kind"]

# Chapters, compared by the words a window repeats …
chapters = catena.segment_cues(cues, duration=7200)

# … or by vectors you made, which know that ships and vessels are one subject.
vectors = embed(catena.cue_windows(cues))
chapters = catena.segment_cues(cues, duration=7200, embeddings=vectors)

split_collection raises ValueError when the document is one work rather than a collection — the usual answer, with the reason each candidate was rejected:

try:
    works = catena.split_collection(markdown)
except ValueError as why:
    works = [{"idx": 0, "title": title, "text": markdown}]

What is bound

Function	The tool it is
chunk_markdown	chunkmd
scrub	mdscrub
count_tokens	textkit
parse_subtitles	cuenorm
pack_cues	cuepack
segment_cues	cueseg
cue_windows	the windows segment_cues measures, to embed
split_collection	mdsplit
fuse_hits	rrf
identify	booksniff
series_of	seriesof
parse_identifier	idnorm
find_citations	citefind
looks_like_footnote_citations	whether a body chunk carries notes worth reading
suggest_author	bibclean's author recovery
canonical_subject	what a closed subject scheme calls a heading
compose_subjects	the subjects a book should carry under one
needs_subject	whether it carries a heading the scheme knows
clean_record	a whole catalogue record audited and repaired
record_problems, record_severity	what is wrong with one, and how much
title_in_author, looks_like_person	the two commonest catalogue faults
is_shouting, title_case, clean_underscores	the repairs that need no lookup
valid_isbn, isbn_from_text, isbn_from_filename	ISBNs, checked and found
same_work	whether two titles name the same book
citation_prompt	the question citefind --prompt writes
merge_citation_reply	what citefind --merge does with the answer

The tools that are not here are the ones a binding would gain nothing over a subprocess for: they read files, shell out to another program, or talk to a server, and none of that is cheaper in process.

JavaScript

npm install catena-corpus

import { chunkMarkdown, scrub, countTokens, fuseHits } from "catena-corpus";

const chunks = chunkMarkdown(markdown, 512, 64);
chunks[0].page;      // 41
chunks[0].chapter;   // 'III. The Second Estate'

fuseHits([...vectorHits, ...textHits], undefined, { vec: 2 }, 20);

Records come back as plain objects, not handles: nothing to free, JSON.stringify works, and an array of chunks spreads into state without ceremony. The declarations are hand-written, so a caller gets Chunk[] rather than any.

splitCollection throws when the document is one work rather than a collection, which is the usual answer.

Two builds, because the loaders differ — node reads the .wasm off disk at import, the web build takes a URL a bundler rewrites:

import { chunkMarkdown } from "catena-corpus";        // resolves per environment
import { chunkMarkdown } from "catena/node";   // or pick one
import { chunkMarkdown } from "catena/web";

C

#include <catena.h>

char *chunks = catena_chunk_markdown(markdown, 512, 64, 50, 768);
if (!chunks) fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", catena_last_error());
/* … a JSON array of chunk records … */
catena_string_free(chunks);

Text in as NUL-terminated UTF-8, records out as NUL-terminated JSON — the same document the command line writes. Nothing here is an opaque handle with accessors to keep in step: the records already have a documented shape, and every language with an FFI has a JSON parser.

Every returned string is yours and must go back through catena_string_free. A call that fails returns NULL and leaves a message in catena_last_error, which is thread-local. catena_abi_version is bumped when anything here changes meaning; additions leave it alone.

A budget of zero means that budget's default, so a caller that cares about one of them can pass zero for the rest.

Building

cd crates/bindings
maturin build --profile wheel      # the Python wheel
npm/build.sh                       # the npm package
cargo build --features capi        # the C library and its header

Three things worth knowing, each of which fails confusingly otherwise:

cargo build --features python does not work and is not supposed to. pyo3's extension-module leaves the Python symbols to be resolved by the interpreter at load time, so there is nothing to link against until an interpreter loads it. cargo clippy --features python type-checks it without linking, which is what the gate runs.

The wheel needs --profile wheel, not --release. The release profile strips, and a stripped extension module is one macOS refuses to load at all — "mis-aligned LINKEDIT string pool". The wheel profile is the release profile without it. [tool.maturin] profile is ignored by maturin 1.15, so it has to be the flag.

The WebAssembly build is only compiled for wasm32. On any other target the module compiles to nothing, so --all-features on a host build does not reach it; the gate checks it separately against wasm32-unknown-unknown.

Swapping a stage over

A binding that returns nearly the same answer as the code it replaces is worse than no binding: the pipeline keeps running and the corpus quietly changes underneath it.

So before swapping anything, run both implementations over a directory of real files and compare the answers field by field — not a sample, and not the test fixtures, which are the inputs somebody already thought of. The things that find divergences are the documents nobody chose.

Two details worth the trouble:

• Compare against the code you are actually replacing. A checkout that has moved on since the port measures the drift rather than the port, and reports failures that are nobody's bug.
• Check that the comparison can fail. Feed one side a deliberately wrong setting and confirm it is reported. A check that cannot fail proves nothing, and one that silently compares nothing looks exactly like success.

As a Rust library

The same surface, without a binding in the way:

let chunks = catena::chunk_markdown(&markdown, catena::ChunkBudgets::default());

Nothing here grows logic of its own. If a binding needs something the libraries cannot do, that is a missing library function rather than a binding feature.

See also

• The records — the shapes these hand back.
• Recipes — the same pipelines from a shell.