The suite could read a cataloguing block and could ask a register, and nothing showed the two together — which is the only way either is worth acting on. A title page alone gives up a running head when the scan starts late; an ISBN alone returns a confidently wrong book when the catalogue has been carrying the wrong one for years. The example's title comparison folds to letters and digits rather than comparing strings. A register and a title page differ over case, over a curly apostrophe against a straight one, and over whether the subtitle counts as part of the title. An example that called those disagreements would teach the wrong lesson, and did until it was fixed. It runs on this library and finds both of the cases worth finding: a file called Document5 by -ducati996 that both sources agree is Russell's Problems of Philosophy, and a Pelikan whose stored ISBN belongs to a book about sculpture.
23 KiB
Recipes
Each tool here does one thing, which is only useful because they compose. This is what the joins look like in practice — including the parts that are not in this suite, because a real pipeline has a database at the end of it.
- A shelf of files, sorted before anything else touches it
- A catalogue out of what the files already say
- Shelving a library by what its books printed
- Asking a model, without this suite calling one
- A scanned book into searchable passages
- A collected edition into one record per work
- A podcast archive into passages you can cite to the second
- Chapter marks for a long recording
- Passages into pgvector
- Hybrid search, fused
- A catalogue that has drifted
- A bibliography that has been copied between formats
- A video library that plays on the thing you carry
- Notes on composing these
A shelf of files, sorted before anything else touches it
Work out what you actually have. Extensions lie — a .pdf that is really a
DjVu will fail four steps later, in a way that looks like a bug in the OCR.
booksniff library/* > manifest.ndjson
What is not what it claims:
jq -r 'select(.kind != .declared_ext) | "\(.path): a \(.kind)"' manifest.ndjson
What is too small to be a book, and probably a download that failed:
jq -r 'select(.notes[]? | test("too small")) | .path' manifest.ndjson
Split the shelf by what each file needs:
jq -r 'select(.kind == "pdf") | .path' manifest.ndjson > pdfs.txt
jq -r 'select(.kind == "epub") | .path' manifest.ndjson > epubs.txt
A catalogue out of what the files already say
Before reaching for a network or a model, read what is already there. Every ebook format has somewhere to put the title, and almost every file has something written in it.
$ bookmeta library/*.epub | jq -r '[.title, .authors[0], (.identifiers.isbn // "—")] | @tsv'
A Collection of Essays George Orwell —
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Mark Twain 9781593081126
Bloodline (Star Wars) Claudia Gray 9781101885253
The Pale-Faced Lie David Crow 9780997487176
Finding Vigano Robert Moynihan —
That is free and offline. Three things build on it.
The ISBNs it found are worth confirming, because a publisher's own file is not evidence the book exists as catalogued:
bookmeta library/*.epub \
| jq -r 'select(.identifiers.isbn) | .identifiers.isbn' \
| idnorm --quiet | bibfetch --polite you@example.org \
| jq -r 'select(.found | not) | "unknown to any register: \(.id)"'
The books that said nothing are the ones worth a person's attention, and the only ones worth a model's time:
bookmeta library/* | jq -r 'select(.title == null) | .path' > silent.txt
Real chapter titles come from the book rather than from a converter's guess:
$ tocfind enlightenment.epub | jq -r 'select(.depth == 0) | .title'
1. Introduction: Radical Enlightenment and “Modernity” (1650–1850)
Part I: The Origins of Democratic Modernity
Part II: Human Rights and Revolution (1770–1830)
Part III: Revolution and Competing Revolutionary Ideologies (1789–1830)
And the language, which decides which OCR to run and which model to embed with:
langid converted/*.md | jq -r 'select(.language != "en") | [.path, .name] | @tsv'
Shelving a library by what its books printed
A catalogue's subjects come from wherever the file came from, which is to say from nowhere in particular. A book's own cataloguing block is the one place its subjects are stated rather than guessed — and stated in Library of Congress form, which is precise and useless for browsing:
$ colophon converted/hobbes.md | jq -r '.subjects[]'
Hobbes, Thomas, 1588–1679. Leviathan
Political science – Early works to 1800
Nobody has a shelf called that. Give colophon the list you actually file by
and it files them for you:
$ cat shelf.txt
Political Science = political science, politics
Byzantine History = byzantium, byzantine, constantinople
Theology = theology, christianity
Ethics
$ colophon --shelf shelf.txt converted/*.md | jq -c '{title, shelved, unshelved}'
{"title":"Leviathan","shelved":["Political Science"],"unshelved":["Hobbes, Thomas, 1588–1679. Leviathan"]}
{"title":"Christianity and Classical Culture","shelved":["Theology"],"unshelved":[]}
unshelved is the point of the exercise. A subject quietly dropped reads
exactly like a book that printed none, and the difference decides whether you
go looking for a heading your shelf is missing.
The title page is not evidence on its own. A scan that begins mid-frontmatter gives up a running head, a copyright line, or the author's name where the title should be. What makes a printed record trustworthy is a second one agreeing, and the ISBN in the same block is how you get one:
colophon --shelf shelf.txt converted/*.md > printed.ndjson
jq -r 'select(.isbns != null) | .isbns[0]' printed.ndjson \
| idnorm --quiet \
| bibfetch --polite you@example.org > register.ndjson
Now two sources that cannot have copied each other have spoken, and you can say which books are settled and which need a person:
jq -s -r '
(.[1] | map({key: .id, value: .}) | from_entries) as $reg
| .[0][]
| . as $printed
| ($reg[$printed.isbns[0] // ""] // {}) as $found
| [ $printed.title,
$found.title,
(if $printed.title and $found.title then "corroborated" else "one source" end)
] | @tsv
' printed.ndjson register.ndjson
The First World War The First World War: A Very Short Introduction corroborated
Document5 The Problems of Philosophy corroborated
Born Fighting — one source
The second row is the case worth the whole recipe: a file named Document5
whose author reads -ducati996, which the book itself and OpenLibrary agree
is Russell's The Problems of Philosophy. The third is the honest failure —
one source said something, nothing confirmed it, and it goes to a human.
In process, where a pipeline actually lives:
import catena
shelf = open("shelf.txt").read()
printed = catena.read_colophon(markdown, shelf=shelf)
found = None
if printed["isbns"]:
found = catena.fetch_identifier(printed["isbns"][0], polite="you@example.org")
settled = bool(printed.get("title") and found and found.get("title"))
catena.shelve(shelf, subjects) files headings a catalogue already holds, by
the same rules, so a record's existing subjects and its book's printed ones are
judged alike.
Asking a model, without this suite calling one
A tool here may compose a prompt. It does not send one. That keeps every answer the same on every run and every machine, and leaves the model, the machine and the GPU yours.
bookmeta --prompt --excerpt opening.txt scan.pdf \
| ollama run qwen3.5:9b \
| bookmeta --merge scan.pdf
Over the shelf, asking only about the files that said nothing:
while read -r f; do
pdftotext -l 3 "$f" - > /tmp/opening.txt
bookmeta --prompt --excerpt /tmp/opening.txt "$f" \
| ollama run qwen3.5:9b \
| bookmeta --merge "$f"
done < silent.txt > filled.ndjson
Four things make that safe to depend on. Only the fields the file left blank
are filled — a model does not get to overrule what the publisher wrote. A
null is an absence, not a value. The prompt is versioned, and a record
filled this way says which version did it. And a reply that is not one JSON
object is refused rather than half-applied.
What comes back is still a claim, so treat it as one:
jq -r 'select(.notes[]? | test("from a model")) | .path' filled.ndjson
A scanned book into searchable passages
The long one. Five decisions, each of which is expensive to get wrong.
1. Is it two pages photographed as one? If it is and you skip this, the OCR interleaves the two columns line by line and produces text that reads like prose and is not.
for f in $(cat pdfs.txt); do
pdfgutter --quiet "$f" && pdfgutter --quiet --into "flat/$(basename "$f")" "$f" \
|| cp "$f" "flat/$(basename "$f")"
done
2. Is the text layer worth having? OCR costs GPU hours. A PDF that already carries good text needs none; one whose text layer is mojibake needs it badly, and the mojibake is invisible until you read a retrieved passage.
pdftriage exits 0 when the layer is fine, 1 when it needs work, and 2
when it could not tell — treat 2 as needing a human, not as a 1.
But "needs work" is four different situations, and OCR is the wrong answer to
one of them. --json says which:
for f in flat/*.pdf; do
case "$(pdftriage --json "$f" | jq -r .text_layer)" in
healthy)
pdftotext -layout "$f" "text/$(basename "$f" .pdf).txt" ;;
reflected_font)
# The one verdict where OCR is the wrong answer: every character is
# already in the file, permuted by a non-standard font encoding, and
# undoing the permutation recovers the text exactly. `pdftriage`'s
# `reflect::undo` does that in process; from a shell today it is still
# an OCR, which is an hour of GPU time to recover text the file holds.
ocrmypdf --force-ocr "$f" "ocr/$(basename "$f")" ;;
absent)
# A scan, with nothing to preserve. The default refuses a file that
# already has text, which is what you want here.
ocrmypdf "$f" "ocr/$(basename "$f")" ;;
garbled|sparse)
# --force-ocr, not --redo-ocr. The text layer looks fine to a machine
# and is mojibake, so anything that "keeps the text it judges good"
# keeps precisely the text that is wrong.
ocrmypdf --force-ocr "$f" "ocr/$(basename "$f")" ;;
esac
done
ocrmypdf and tesseract are not part of this suite and will not be. A
trained OCR model and a PDF rebuilt around an invisible text layer are not a
filter's work; deciding whether to call one, and with which flag, is.
3. Convert to markdown. Whatever you like: pandoc, marker, pdftotext
and a script. Nothing here cares, as long as what comes out is markdown with
<!-- Page 41 --> markers where the pages were.
4. Clean it. Conversion leaves residue — stray HTML, control characters, headings that are not headings.
mdscrub --pages raw/book.md > clean/book.md
5. Cut it into passages.
chunkmd --target 512 --overlap 64 clean/book.md > chunks/book.ndjson
The whole of it, for one book:
$ pandoc -t commonmark chapter.xhtml | mdscrub | chunkmd --min-tokens 10
{"v":1,"idx":0,"text":"The obligation ran both ways, and contemporaries said so plainly whenever they were asked. A lord who could not protect was a lord who could not command, and the rolls record the consequences in the plainest possible terms across three generations of tenure disputes.","tokens":50,"page":41,"chapter":"Chapter One","role":"body","start_time":null,"end_time":null,"flags":[]}
Every chunk carries the page it came from and the chapter it sits under, which is what lets a search result cite itself.
What a book leans on
The bibliography is the one part of a book that is already structured. Every
entry names a work, and most name it in one of a handful of shapes that have
not changed in a century — so citefind reads it without asking anybody
anything.
$ citefind bibliography.md | head -1
{"v":1,"idx":0,"text":"Abogunrin, S. O. “The Three Variant Accounts of Peter’s Call: A Critical and Theological Examination of the Texts.” *New Testament Studies* 31 (1985): 587–602.","marker":null,"authors":["Abogunrin, S. O."],"year":1985,"title":"The Three Variant Accounts of Peter’s Call: A Critical and Theological Examination of the Texts","container":"New Testament Studies","pages":"587–602","ids":[],"kind":"article","continuation":false,"unsettled":[]}
Whose work a book rests on, counted:
citefind bibliography.md \
| jq -r 'select(.authors | length > 0) | .authors[0]' \
| sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head
64 Yates
26 Quigley
23 Bulgakov, Sergius
17 Lorenz, K.
What it reads, and what it reaches for:
citefind bibliography.md | jq -r .kind | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
4200 other
3356 book
808 chapter
700 article
300 web
The identifiers it finds, checked and resolved against a register:
citefind bibliography.md \
| jq -r '.ids[]? | select(.kind == "doi") | .id' \
| idnorm | bibfetch
Across a whole shelf
Every book's bibliography, cut out of the converted markdown and read:
for f in converted/*.md; do
awk '/^#+ *(Bibliography|References|Works Cited|Notes)/{on=1} on' "$f" \
| citefind 2>/dev/null \
| jq -c --arg from "$(basename "$f" .md)" '. + {citing: $from}'
done > citations.ndjson
Over thirty converted books that was 14,481 references, 10,536 of them naming
a work, in about a second. A book whose heading matched but whose section was
empty exits 1 and says so on stderr, which is why the loop sends it
nowhere.
Which works the shelf agrees on — cited by the most different books:
jq -r 'select(.title) | [.citing, (.title | ascii_downcase)] | @tsv' citations.ndjson \
| sort -u | cut -f2 | uniq -c | sort -rn | head
Counted per citing book rather than per entry, so a work cited forty times in one bibliography still counts once. On a shelf whose books share a subject this is the spine of the field; on one that does not, it is mostly ones.
That is a citation graph, built out of the books themselves, with nothing running but a parser.
What it could not read
Every record names the fields it could not settle. A bibliography set in a style the parser does not know, or a chunk that began part-way through an entry, shows up here rather than as a confident wrong answer:
citefind bibliography.md | jq -r 'select(.unsettled | length > 0) | .text'
--prompt writes a question about exactly those entries and no others, for a
model of your choosing. Nothing is sent from here:
citefind --prompt bibliography.md | ollama run qwen3:8b > reply.json
citefind --merge reply.json bibliography.md
A reply fills in only the fields that were asked about; a model that
volunteers a better title for an entry whose title was read off the page is
overruled. Most bibliographies have nothing to ask about, and --prompt
exits 1 and writes nothing when that is so.
A collected edition into one record per work
Forty books in one file, indexed whole, means a query for any of them returns a passage that could be from any other — and the title on the result names the collection rather than the work.
mdsplit --into sections/ complete-works.md
for f in sections/*.md; do
mdscrub "$f" | chunkmd > "chunks/$(basename "$f" .md).ndjson"
done
mdsplit exits 1 when the document is one work rather than a collection,
which is the usual answer and not a failure:
mdsplit --into sections/ book.md || cp book.md sections/000-book.md
Scripture is recognised and grouped by book rather than by chapter, because every chapter there is its own heading and splitting on those gives a thousand fragments instead of sixty-six works.
A podcast archive into passages you can cite to the second
for f in transcripts/*.srt; do
cuenorm "$f" | cuepack --seconds 75 > "chunks/$(basename "$f" .srt).ndjson"
done
$ cuenorm episode.srt | cuepack --seconds 5
{"v":1,"idx":0,"text":"the mill stood at the northern end","tokens":7,"page":null,"chapter":null,"role":"body","start_time":1.0,"end_time":4.0,"flags":[]}
{"v":1,"idx":1,"text":"of the valley where the road turned","tokens":7,"page":null,"chapter":null,"role":"body","start_time":4.0,"end_time":8.0,"flags":[]}
The same chunk record a book produces, with times where a book has pages. So
everything downstream — embedding, storage, retrieval — is the same code.
cuepack also reads a subtitle file directly, so cuenorm is only needed when
the input is in a format cuepack would otherwise have to guess at, or when
you want the cue stream for something else.
Chapter marks for a long recording
cuenorm episode.vtt | cueseg --duration 7200 > chapters.ndjson
One segment per topic, with a title and an excerpt — the marks a player
needs, and the spans to hand a summariser one at a time.
Passages into pgvector
emb turns lines into vectors. It is the only tool here that touches the
network, and it never loads a model: the model lives behind a server where its
GPU is somebody else's problem.
jq -r '.text | @json' chunks/book.ndjson | jq -r 'fromjson' \
| emb --model nomic-embed-text --dim 768 > vectors.ndjson
Output lines correspond to input lines one for one, so the two files zip together by position:
paste -d'\t' \
<(jq -c '{text, page, chapter, start_time, end_time}' chunks/book.ndjson) \
vectors.ndjson > rows.tsv
The table:
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS vector;
CREATE TABLE passage (
id bigserial PRIMARY KEY,
source text NOT NULL,
idx int NOT NULL,
body text NOT NULL,
page int,
chapter text,
start_time double precision,
end_time double precision,
embedding vector(768) NOT NULL,
fts tsvector GENERATED ALWAYS AS (to_tsvector('english', body)) STORED
);
CREATE INDEX ON passage USING hnsw (embedding vector_cosine_ops);
CREATE INDEX ON passage USING gin (fts);
Loading it, with psql:
psql -c "\copy passage (source, idx, body, page, chapter, start_time, end_time, embedding)
FROM 'rows.csv' WITH (FORMAT csv)"
vector accepts its text form — [0.1,0.2,…] — which is exactly what emb
writes, so the JSON array goes into the column as it stands.
Two indexes because two kinds of question: hnsw answers "what is this
about", gin answers "who said this exact phrase". Neither is good at the
other's job, which is what the next recipe is for.
Hybrid search, fused
Ask both indexes, then fuse the rankings rather than the scores — a cosine
distance and a ts_rank are not on the same scale and never will be.
-- the vector channel
SELECT id, row_number() OVER (ORDER BY embedding <=> $1) AS rank,
1 - (embedding <=> $1) AS score
FROM passage ORDER BY embedding <=> $1 LIMIT 50;
-- the text channel
SELECT id, row_number() OVER (ORDER BY ts_rank(fts, q) DESC) AS rank,
ts_rank(fts, q) AS score
FROM passage, websearch_to_tsquery('english', $2) q
WHERE fts @@ q ORDER BY 2 LIMIT 50;
Turn each into hit records — channel of vec and fts — and fuse:
$ cat vec.ndjson fts.ndjson | rrf -n 2
{"v":1,"id":"c81a","channel":"vec","rank":1,"score":0.032266458495966696,"payload":{}}
{"v":1,"id":"d42f","channel":"fts","rank":2,"score":0.01639344262295082,"payload":{}}
The two streams can be interleaved and in any order — each hit carries the rank its own channel gave it, so nothing has to be grouped first.
Weight a channel you trust more:
cat vec.ndjson fts.ndjson | rrf --weight vec=2 --weight fts=1 -n 20
Put anything you want carried through in payload and it comes out untouched,
which saves a second round trip to fetch the text of what you just ranked.
A catalogue that has drifted
bibclean --flagged catalogue.ndjson > repairs.ndjson
Every change comes with a reason, so the output is reviewable rather than something you have to trust.
Headings accumulate spellings — the same author entered three ways, a subject that grew a bracket:
vocabmerge --kind author authors.ndjson > merges.ndjson
vocabmerge --kind tag tags.ndjson >> merges.ndjson
Series and volume, which most catalogues have on almost nothing:
seriesof catalogue.ndjson \
| jq -r 'select(.volume) | "UPDATE book SET series = \(.series|@json), series_index = \(.volume) WHERE title = \(.title|@json);"' \
| psql
Apply only what you believe:
jq -r 'select(.action == "merge" and .confidence >= 0.9)
| "UPDATE book SET author_id = \(.keep_id) WHERE author_id = \(.drop_id);"' \
merges.ndjson | psql
A bibliography that has been copied between formats
Identifiers arrive wrapped in whatever the last tool left on them, and a catalogue that stores them as they came cannot tell two spellings of one DOI apart.
idnorm --quiet refs.txt > ids.ndjson
The ones that cannot be right — an ISBN or an ISSN whose check digit fails:
jq -r 'select(.checksum == false) | .input' ids.ndjson
The ones that are well formed and still wrong, which needs a register:
bibfetch --polite you@example.org ids.ndjson \
| jq -r 'select(.found | not) | "missing: \(.id)"'
That second question is a different one, which is why it is a different tool:
idnorm never touches the network and bibfetch does nothing else.
Filling in what you only had the identifier for:
idnorm --quiet refs.txt | bibfetch \
| jq -r 'select(.found) | "\(.year)\t\(.authors | join(", "))\t\(.title)"'
A video library that plays on the thing you carry
for f in library/*.webm library/*.mkv; do
plan=$(avplan "$f") && eval "$plan"
done
avplan writes nothing for a file that already plays and exits non-zero, so
&& skips it — you convert the six files that need it rather than the ninety
in the directory. An already-H.264 picture is copied rather than re-encoded,
which is the difference between forty minutes and forty seconds.
To see why before committing to it:
avplan --json talk.mkv | jq -r '.reasons[]'
Notes on composing these
Exit codes are the control flow. 0 yes, 1 no, 2 could not tell. That
is what makes && and || work as the branching in every loop above. Anything
64 and over is a failure rather than an answer, so a script that treats
non-zero as "no" will eventually treat a broken file as a healthy one — test
for the code you mean.
NDJSON goes through pipes and into files equally well. Every tool writes one record per line and flushes as it goes, so a slow stage downstream starts work on the first record rather than the last.
Nothing here has state. Run any of it twice, on any machine, in any order;
parallelise a loop with xargs -P without coordinating anything. The tools
that call another program say so in --help and exit 69 when it is missing,
rather than guessing.
Keep the records. The chunk that went into the database is the audit trail for the passage that comes out of it. Storage is cheaper than re-running OCR.
See also
- What these programs promise — the rules all of them keep.
- The records — the shapes that travel between them.