catena/crates/citefind

citefind

The references in a bibliography or a page of notes.

Part of catena.

What it does

A reference list is the one place in a book where the text is already structured. Every entry names a work, and most name it in one of a handful of shapes that have not changed in a century. What is missing is not information but punctuation: the entries run together, and nothing in the file says where one stops.

So this does two jobs. It cuts the block into entries — at the note numbers where there are any, at the layout where there are not. Then it reads each entry as far as its shape allows, and names the fields it could not settle rather than guessing at them.

That last part is the point. A made-up year and a real one are indistinguishable three stages downstream; a missing one is not.

When you would use it

• Building a citation graph — which works a book leans on, and how often.
• Finding the identifiers in a reference list, to hand to idnorm and bibfetch.
• Filling a catalogue from the back of a book rather than from a register.
• Costing a model run: ask one about the entries that did not parse, and nothing else.

Install

cargo install --git https://git.pumpin.online/funkpower/catena citefind

Example

$ citefind bibliography.md
{"v":1,"idx":0,"text":"Smith, John. *The Making of the Second Estate*. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.","authors":["Smith, John"],"year":1998,"title":"The Making of the Second Estate","container":"Clarendon Press","ids":[],"kind":"book","continuation":false,"unsettled":[]}
{"v":1,"idx":1,"text":"Doe, Jane, and Peter Brown. \"Obligation and Its Limits.\" *Journal of Medieval Studies* 12, no. 3 (2001): 45-67.","authors":["Doe, Jane","Peter Brown"],"year":2001,"title":"Obligation and Its Limits","container":"Journal of Medieval Studies","pages":"45-67","ids":[],"kind":"article","continuation":false,"unsettled":[]}

What a book cites, by year:

citefind bibliography.md | jq -r 'select(.year) | .year' | sort | uniq -c

The identifiers, checked and resolved:

citefind refs.md | jq -r '.ids[] | select(.kind == "doi") | .id' | idnorm | bibfetch

The works it leans on hardest, from a page of endnotes:

citefind notes.md | jq -r 'select(.title) | .title' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head

Asking a model about the rest

--prompt writes a question about the entries that did not parse, and only those. Nothing is sent from here: the prompt goes to stdout and what happens to it is yours to decide.

$ citefind --prompt refs.md
Below are entries from the bibliography or notes of a book. Each was read as
far as its punctuation allowed, and the fields that could not be read off it
are listed with it.

--- 0
text: Marron, Kevin Ritual Abuse, Seal Books, 1988
year: 1988
wanted: authors, title, container
...

citefind --prompt refs.md | ollama run qwen3:8b > reply.json
citefind --merge reply.json refs.md

A reply fills in only the fields that were asked about. A model that volunteers a better title for an entry whose title was read off the page is overruled — the page is evidence and the model is a guess — and a reply that is not one JSON object is refused rather than half-applied.

One prompt covers every unsettled entry rather than one prompt each. A reference list is long and mostly ordinary; the entries worth asking about are the mangled few, and they are cheaper to ask about together.

Options

Option	Effect
--prompt	Write the question about what did not parse, instead of the records
--merge FILE	Fill in what did not parse from a model's reply
--quiet, -q	Say nothing; the exit code is the answer
--man	Write this page as a manual page, in roff

Exit codes

Code	Meaning
0	It found references
1	It found none
64	The command line was wrong
65	The input was not readable as text, or a reply was not JSON
74	The file could not be read

The record

Field	What it holds
text	The entry as it appeared, whitespace collapsed
marker	The note number it carried, where it carried one
authors	The names, in the order and the form the entry gave them
year	The year of publication
title	The work cited — for an article the article, not the journal
container	The journal it appeared in, or the publisher of a book
pages	The pages, as written
ids	Any DOI, ISBN, ISSN, arXiv id or URL, normalised
kind	book, article, chapter, web or other
continuation	Whether it only points back at an earlier entry
unsettled	The fields it could not read off the entry

text is kept whatever else was read, because every other field is an interpretation of it and somebody will want to check.

How it cuts

A page of notes is cut at its note numbers, in any of the shapes conversion leaves them: 12., [12], fn39., a superscript, or a back-reference link. The pattern is the one chunkmd uses to recognise a page of notes, so the two cannot drift apart, with one form added — a link pointing at another file rather than at a fragment. chunkmd is deciding whether a chunk is a page of notes and can afford to miss one marker in thirty; here a missed marker runs two references together.

A note that cites nothing is dropped. A page of notes mixes bibliographic notes with discursive ones, and a remark about the argument is not a reference — and one that runs on for six sentences with no imprint, no page reference and no identifier is a remark whatever else it mentions.

A note that cites several works becomes several records, cut at the semicolons that separate them, each keeping the note's number. A full stop separates works in a note too, and is not used: it also separates the author from the title in every bibliography entry ever written.

Where the first note number sits a long way into the block, what precedes it is the body of the page rather than a note that lost its number, and it is left out.

A bibliography numbers nothing, so the signal is layout: a blank line between entries, a hanging indent under each, or the surname-comma opening that nearly every author-first entry begins with. Whichever the block carries is the one used. When it carries none of them the fallback is one entry per line, which is right for a list that was never wrapped and visibly wrong for one that was.

What it will not do

Resolve ibid. A continuation refers to whatever was cited before it, which is a fact about the surrounding page and not about the entry. It is flagged continuation and left alone, and it is left out of --prompt entirely — there is nothing in it to ask about.

Report a title it did not find. An entry held together by commas alone, with no names to anchor it, yields no title rather than its own text echoed back. Nor does a run carrying a page reference or a semicolon count as one: that is two entries run together, or a reference to a work rather than the name of one.

Name a place of publication as the publisher. (London, 1973) says where a book was published and not by whom, so container stays empty. The place is still in text.

A rule of dashes where the author should be is the exception, and a deliberate one: ———. *The Second Book*. means the author of the entry above, the style says so, and the entry it refers to is the one immediately before. That is read and filled in.

As a library

for one in citefind::read(&text) {
    println!("{} ({}) {:?}", one.authors.join("; "), one.year.unwrap_or(0), one.title);
}

citefind::split::entries cuts a block without reading the entries. citefind::parse::one reads an entry already cut. citefind::prompt::compose and merge are the two halves of the model-facing path, and prompt::PROMPT_VERSION says which wording produced a given answer.

From Python, JavaScript or C, through bindings:

for one in catena.find_citations(text):
    print(one["year"], one["title"], one["unsettled"])

See also

• idnorm — the identifiers it finds, checked.
• bibfetch — what a register says about them.
• chunkmd — which flags the chunks worth feeding it.
• bibclean — the same audit for a catalogue record.