WebAssembly rather than a native Node addon: one artifact serves Node,
Deno, Bun, a browser and anything built on them, where napi would have
meant a prebuilt binary per platform and a source build for whoever the
matrix missed. The engine is pure computation and the menologion is
already compiled in, so there is nothing for it to give up.
A day comes back as a plain object, not a handle. A wasm class would
have meant a .free() that every caller eventually forgets, and this way
JSON.stringify works and the thing spreads into state. Two serializer
defaults had to be overridden to keep the promise that it is the same
document --json emits: maps as objects, and an absent field as null
rather than undefined, which stringify would otherwise drop entirely.
The TypeScript is hand-written, because the generated types for a value
crossing as JsValue are `any`, and a binding that types its whole
return as `any` is a binding TypeScript cannot check. tsc --strict is a release
gate now, the way mypy --strict already is, and the check includes three
lines that must fail to compile.
The one place this differs from every other binding: no remembered
default jurisdiction, because a browser has nowhere to keep one. It is
called out in the README, in the types and in docs/versioning.md.
The test resolves typikon through a staged node_modules rather than a
relative path, so what it exercises is the exports map, and it compares
a year of days field by field against the command line for four
jurisdictions.
An adversarial review of the release, and four of its findings were things
PyPI never lets you replace once uploaded.
- rust-version said 1.74. clap has needed 1.85 since 4.6, and cargo
hard-errors rather than warning, so the sdist advertised a floor it could
not build on. docs/releasing.md sends macOS and Windows users to that
sdist.
- The wheel was classified Development Status :: 4 - Beta on a release the
changelog calls stable, with none of the Python version classifiers PyPI
indexes on.
- Six README links were relative. PyPI resolves them against the project
page, so every one 404'd there, as they do on the live 0.2.0 page now.
- in that order packs the wheel into the
sdist. The tarball on disk was 431KB with an x86-64 binary inside it.
Also: twine upload gains --skip-existing, so a retry after a partial upload
finishes rather than dying on a version that cannot be reused; twine check
gains the renderer that makes it parse the description at all, without which
it returns None and reports PASSED; and the README no longer claims a
twenty-year sweep the test did not run, because 366 * 21 / 4 is five years.
The test now runs the twenty-one it was named for.
The crates.io name belongs to an unrelated project, which the README now says
rather than leaving a reader to find out from cargo.
Tag-driven releases. main is always releasable, a vX.Y.Z tag on it builds the
sdist and the manylinux wheels and publishes them; Cargo.toml carries the version
and the first job refuses to go on if the tag disagrees with it, because PyPI
will not let a version be reused even after it is yanked.
CI fires on push and on nothing else. This forge is public and takes pull
requests from strangers, and a runner executes whatever the workflow checks out,
so a pull_request trigger would run unread code from a stranger on the runner
host. Push-only means the runner only ever runs what someone with push rights put
there. A pull request therefore gets no automatic check: read it, push the branch,
let it run then.
No cargo fmt gate. The tables here are aligned by hand and rustfmt wants one entry
per line, which loses the shape that makes MONTHS and JURISDICTIONS readable — a
gate that fights the house style is a gate that gets ignored. Clippy stays, and
passes.
The Python job builds the bindings against the CLI it just built and runs them
against each other, because they are one engine and the only way that stays true
is if something checks.
docs/releasing.md covers what does not exist yet: Actions is off on this forge on
purpose, there is no runner, and PyPI's trusted publishing does not speak to
Forgejo — so a long-lived token has to live here, project-scoped rather than
account-wide so a compromised forge costs this package rather than all of them.