2026-09-19 11:06:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
# Known divergences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Places where the Rust and the Python deliberately do not agree, each with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
reason it is acceptable. A divergence that is not written down here is a bug,
|
|
|
|
|
|
and loosening a test instead of adding an entry here is how a port rots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
## <function> — <one-line summary>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Python:** what it does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Rust:** what it does instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Why this is acceptable:** the argument, including what input class is
|
|
|
|
|
|
affected and how often it occurs in practice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Measured:** how many records out of how many differ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-19 11:30:05 -04:00
|
|
|
|
## mdscrub — un-paginated text is not given a page 1 marker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Python:** `_normalize_marker_pages` ends by wrapping any text it found no
|
|
|
|
|
|
pagination in as `<!-- Page 1 -->\n\n…`, so that downstream can assume a
|
|
|
|
|
|
marker exists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Rust:** text with no page separators and no form feeds is returned
|
|
|
|
|
|
unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Why this is acceptable:** a cleanup filter has to be safe to run twice, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Python's version is not — a second pass wraps the first pass's marker in
|
|
|
|
|
|
another one. The assumption it exists to serve belongs to the converter that
|
|
|
|
|
|
knows it just read a PDF, not to a filter that is handed markdown of unknown
|
|
|
|
|
|
provenance. The chunker already handles a document with no page markers by
|
|
|
|
|
|
emitting chunks with no page number, which is the honest answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Measured:** not exercised by any parity case, since the Python function is
|
|
|
|
|
|
only reachable from the PDF conversion path. Covered by
|
|
|
|
|
|
`mdscrub::pages::tests::text_with_no_page_boundaries_is_left_exactly_as_it_was`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## chunkmd, role and footnote patterns — `\s` excludes four control characters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Python:** `\s` in a `str` pattern matches the Unicode `White_Space`
|
|
|
|
|
|
property *and* `U+001C`–`U+001F`, the four ASCII information separators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Rust:** `regex` and `fancy-regex` match the `White_Space` property only, so
|
|
|
|
|
|
those four characters are not whitespace to a ported pattern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Why this is acceptable:** every one of those codepoints is deleted by
|
|
|
|
|
|
`mdscrub` before a chunker sees it — they fall inside the control-character
|
|
|
|
|
|
class that a text column rejects. For the pattern to behave differently, a
|
|
|
|
|
|
document would have to reach `chunkmd` without having been cleaned, and carry
|
|
|
|
|
|
an information separator in exactly the position where a pattern expects
|
|
|
|
|
|
whitespace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this does **not** apply to the sentence and paragraph splitters in
|
|
|
|
|
|
`textkit`, which match Python's definition exactly — see
|
|
|
|
|
|
`textkit::segment::is_space`. Those decide chunk boundaries, so the four
|
|
|
|
|
|
characters are handled there rather than argued about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Measured:** zero differences over the parity corpus; the sample in
|
|
|
|
|
|
`parity/src/sample.rs` includes `U+001C` deliberately and the token counts
|
|
|
|
|
|
agree over all ten thousand lines.
|